Leadership Exposed: Things You Thought You Knew About Leadership
Much has been written about leadership: rules, pointers, styles, and biographies of inspiring leaders throughout world history. But there are certain leadership ideas that we ourselves fail to recognize and realize in the course of reading books. Here is a short list of things you thought you knew about leadership.
1. Leaders come in different flavors.
There are different types of leaders and you will probably encounter more than one type in your lifetime. Formal leaders are those we elect into positions or offices such as the senators, congressmen, and presidents of the local clubs. Informal leaders or those we look up to by virtue of their wisdom and experience such as in the case of the elders of a tribe, or our grandparents; or by virtue of their expertise and contribution on a given field such as Albert Einstein in the field of Theoretical Physics and Leonardo da Vinci in the field of the Arts. Both formal and informal leaders practice a combination of leadership styles.
Lewin’s three basic leadership styles: authoritative, participative, and delegative
Likert’s four leadership styles: exploitive authoritative, benevolent authoritative, consultative, and participative
Goleman’s six emotional leadership styles – visionary, coaching, affiliative, democratic, pacesetting, and commanding.
2. Leadership is a process of becoming.
Although certain people seem to be born with innate leadership qualities, without the right environment and exposure, they may fail to develop their full potential. So like learning how to ride a bicycle, you can also learn how to become a leader and hone your leadership abilities.
Knowledge on leadership theories and skills may be formally gained by enrolling in leadership seminars, workshops, and conferences. Daily interactions with people provide the opportunity to observe and practice leadership theories. Together, formal and informal learning will help you gain leadership attitudes, gain leadership insights, and thus furthering the cycle of learning.
You do not become a leader in one day and just stop. Life-long learning is important in becoming a good leader for each day brings new experiences that put your knowledge, skills, and attitude to a test.
3. Leadership starts with you.
The best way to develop leadership qualities is to apply it to your own life. As an adage goes “action speaks louder than words.” Leaders are always in the limelight. Keep in mind that your credibility as a leader depends much on your actions: your interaction with your family, friends, and co-workers; your way of managing your personal and organizational responsibilities; and even the way you talk with the newspaper vendor across the street.
Repeated actions become habits. Habits in turn form a person’s character. Steven Covey’s book entitled “7 Habits of Highly Effective People” provides good insights on how you can achieve personal leadership.
4. Leadership is shared.
Leadership is not the sole responsibility of one person, but rather a shared responsibility among members of an emerging team. A leader belongs to a group. Each member has responsibilities to fulfill.
Formal leadership positions are merely added responsibilities aside from their responsibilities as members of the team. Effective leadership requires members to do their share of work. Starting as a mere group of individuals, members and leaders work towards the formation of an effective team. In this light, social interaction plays a major role in leadership.
To learn how to work together requires a great deal of trust between and among leaders and members of an emerging team. Trust is built upon actions and not merely on words. When mutual respect exists, trust is fostered and confidence is built.
5. Leadership styles depend on the situation.
How come dictatorship works for Singapore but not in the United States of America? Aside from culture, beliefs, value system, and form of government, the current situation of a nation also affects the leadership styles used by its formal leaders. There is no rule that only one style can be used. Most of the time, leaders employ a combination of leadership styles depending on the situation.
In emergency situations such as periods of war and calamity, decision-making is a matter of life and death. Thus, a nation’s leader cannot afford to consult with all departments to arrive at crucial decisions. The case is of course different in times of peace and order—different sectors and other branches of government can freely interact and participate in governance.
Another case in point is in leading organizations. When the staffs are highly motivated and competent, a combination of high delegative and moderate participative styles of leadership is most appropriate. But if the staffs have low competence and low commitment, a combination of high coaching, high supporting, and high directing behavior from organizational leaders is required.
Now that you are reminded of these things, keep in mind that there are always ideas that we think we already know; concepts we take for granted, but are actually the most useful insights on leadership.
Carl Hoffman
http://www.articlesbase.com/self-help-articles/leadership-exposed-things-you-thought-you-knew-about-leadership-93667.html
Leadership Exposed
Much has been written about leadership: rules, pointers, styles, and biographies of inspiring leaders throughout world history. But there are certain leadership ideas that we fail to recognize and realize in the course of reading books. Here is a short list of things you thought you knew about leadership.
1. Leaders come in different flavors: There are all different types of leaders and you will probably encounter more than one type in your lifetime.
Formal leaders are those we elect into positions or offices such as the senators, congressmen, and presidents of local clubs.
Informal leaders or those we look up to by virtue of their wisdom and experience such as in the case of the elders of a tribe, or our grandparents; or by virtue of their expertise and contribution on a given field such as Albert Einstein in the field of Theoretical Physics and Leonardo da Vinci in the field of the Arts. Both formal and informal leaders practice a combination of leadership styles.
- Lewin’s three basic leadership styles – authoritative, participative, and delegative
- Likert’s four leadership styles – exploitive authoritative, benevolent authoritative, consultative, and participative
- Goleman’s six emotional leadership styles – visionary, coaching, affiliative, democratic, pacesetting, and commanding.
2. Leadership is a process of becoming: Although certain people seem to be born with innate leadership qualities, without the right environment and exposure, they may fail to develop their full potential. Similar to learning how to ride a bicycle, you can also learn how to become a leader and hone your leadership abilities.
Knowledge on leadership theories and skills may be formally gained by enrolling in leadership seminars, workshops, and conferences. Daily interactions with people provide the opportunity to observe and practice leadership theories.
Together, formal and informal learning will help you gain leadership attitudes, gain leadership insights, and thus furthering the cycle of learning. You don’t become a leader in one day and just stop. Life-long learning is important in becoming a good leader, for each day brings new experiences that put your knowledge, skills, and attitude to the test.
3. Leadership starts with you: The best way to develop leadership qualities is to apply them in your own life. I’m sure you’ve heard the phrase “action speaks louder than words.”
Leaders are always in the limelight. Keep in mind that your credibility as a leader depends much on your actions: your interaction with your family, friends, and co-workers; your way of managing your personal and organizational responsibilities; and even the way you talk with the newspaper vendor across the street.
You can’t just “talk the talk,” you have to “walk the walk.” Repeated actions become habits. Habits in turn form a person’s character. Steven Covey’s book entitled 7 Habits of Highly Effective People provides good insights on how you can achieve personal leadership.
4. Leadership is shared: Leadership is not the sole responsibility of one person, but rather a shared responsibility among members of an emerging team. A leader belongs to a group. Each member has responsibilities to fulfill.
Formal leadership positions are merely added responsibilities aside from their responsibilities as members of the team. Effective leadership requires members to do their share of work. Starting as a mere group of individuals, members and leaders work towards the formation of an effective team.
In this light, social interaction plays a major role in leadership. To learn how to work together requires a great deal of trust amongst leaders and members of an emerging team. Trust is built upon actions and not merely on words. When mutual respect exists, trust is fostered and confidence is built.
5. Leadership styles depend on the situation: How come dictatorship works for Singapore but not in the United States of America? Aside from culture, beliefs, value system, and form of government, the current situation of a nation also affects the leadership styles used by its formal leaders.
There is no rule that only one style can be used. Most of the time, leaders employ a combination of leadership styles depending on the situation. In emergency situations such as periods of war and calamity, decision-making is a matter of life and death. Thus, a nation’s leader may not have the luxury of consulting with all departments to arrive at crucial decisions.
The case is of course different in times of peace and order. Different sectors and other branches of government can freely interact and participate in governance. Another case in point is in leading organizations. When the staffs are highly motivated and competent, a combination of high delegative and moderate participative styles of leadership is most appropriate. But if the staffs have low competence and low commitment, a combination of high coaching, high supporting, and high directing behavior from organizational leaders is required.
Now that you are aware of these things, keep in mind that there are always ideas that we think we already know. There are concepts we take for granted, but they are actually the most useful insights on leadership.
Louis Bonaventura
http://www.articlesbase.com/advice-articles/leadership-exposed-127787.html
Miltary Leadership Styles – Situational Leadership
http://www.part-time-commander.com/leadership_87.html Discover how to be a better leader and company commander.
Duration : 0:1:16
Contrasting leadership styles in Henry V and Macbeth?
I know that Macbeth is a bad leader, (belives in superstiton and is influenced by his wife) and Henry is a good leader (He would punish his friend if they did something wrong) But I really can’t put it together for and 600 word essay as I need to make it longer and stuff, so yeah. I need to contrast their styles and how to they relate to today’s society.
Henry V by William Shakespeare.
Analysis of Major Characters:
http://www.sparknotes.com/shakespeare/henryv/canalysis.html
http://www.pinkmonkey.com/booknotes/monkeynotes/pmHenryV40.asp
http://www.cliffsnotes.com/study_guide/literature/Henry-V-Character-Analysis-King-Henry-V.id-13,pageNum-225.html
Sources for Henry V
http://www.shakespeare-online.com/sources/henryvsources.html
————————————————————-
Macbeth by William Shakespeare.
Analysis of Major Characters:
http://www.clicknotes.com/macbeth/Char.html
http://www.litcharts.com/lit/macbeth/characters
http://www.shmoop.com/macbeth/characters.html
http://nfs.sparknotes.com/macbeth/characters.html
Develop your Leadership Styles and Skills
What is it that has set the great leaders and entrepreneurs of the world apart from the rest of the world? You know what I’m talking about- the truly remarkable ones that have made their mark on the world. Sam Walton didn’t create the Wal-Mart Empire overnight, and he certainly didn’t do it alone. He had a group of quality employees working for him, a group that both respected and admired Mr. Walton and of his accomplishments. He is a prime example of possessing the right leadership styles and skills to get the job done, and created and kingdom in the process.
Of course, success means different things to different people; therefore the personal definition of leadership must also be different. The dictionary lists the word “leadership” as the ability to or the activity of leading. Ronald Reagan, one of the most respected presidents that the United States ever had (with one of the highest approval ratings to boot), watched a nation suffer with double digit unemployment for years. Napoleon was a great leader, and so was Attila the Hun, but neither of them was liked very much by those they led, but were either respected or frightened into following as they did. “Ruling with an iron fist” is what these gents did best, but this means demanding respect as a form of leadership is not the best way for everyone. You need to find what will work best for you, your needs and your goals. The big trick is to find them.
We’ve all heard the proverbs like “There is no “I” in T-E-A-M” and “We can’t Spell “SUCCESS” without “U”. Motivational speakers around the globe are always speaking of believe, conceive, and achieve. And while these all seem to make sense, it can be tough to put these tidbits of information and proverbial quotes to work and attain the results that we’re looking for, and there’s only so much room in the business world for trial and error. So what exactly are those of us climbing up the corporate ladder or building our own rung-by-rung supposed to do?
A plan needs to be created, filled with different ideas from different angles. Timelines need to be set with as much detail as possible. Finally, a goal needs to be deciphered amongst it all, one that is reasonable and undoubtedly achievable. If the plan isn’t working for one reason or another, you must be able to switch to a different route without disruption, as disruption can cause chaos, which can set you farther back from where you started.
There are a number of quality websites out there designed for the sole purpose of relaying quality information and ideas about leadership and the business world, passing on information on a plethora of shapes and forms, all which has worked for so many. By taking one idea from one success story and another idea from the next, you’ll be sure to create your own plan and story of success.
John McKinnon
http://www.articlesbase.com/business-articles/develop-your-leadership-styles-and-skills-81582.html
who can tell about Autocratic vs. Democratic Leadership Styles?
Autocratic means absolute power in the hands of a single individual. The an Autocratic system is often synonymous with dictatorship, tyranny, or absolute monarchy. However in an autocracy, there is very little delegation in decision making. Hitler, for instance, was a dictator with absolute power. Still, he left a lot of day to day things be run by underlings. In an autocratic system, the top guy not only has all the power but has to often personally approve or direct almost every decision of government. It also means that pretty much all decisions tend to be made by the single individual which can lead to a lot overhead.
The Czar of Russia was often called an Autocrat. For example, there is an old story that in Russia there was a man who was named "Pig" by his parents. He did not enjoy the name as you might imagine. Here he could go to court and get a judge to legally change his name. In Russia, the Czar had to actually approve it. There were thousands if not millions of such little decisions that only the Czar could rule on. Hitler could care less if someone’s name was Pig or not. He’d let a judge rule on it and that was that.
A democratic leadership style is one in which the leader’s decisions are often submitted to a vote by the people or legislature. This is often confused with democratically elected leaders since there is a lot of overlap. The US President can be said to have a democratic leadership style when it comes to legislation, specially taxes. He has to submit his proposal to congress and get a vote on it. In some states, the Governor can go directly to the people with a referendum and get their yes or no.
However, there are certain powers the President has that require no approval from congress or the people. He can ask for their approval, but is not bound by it. The most undemocratic of these is the pardon power. The President’s power to pardon people for federal crimes is unlimited and can not be overruled by congress or the supreme court. He can let loose every prisoner in federal custody tonight. Congress could impeach him and remove him, but the pardon’s can not be revoked.
Another undemocratic power of the president is executive orders. These are essentially decrees by the President that have the force of law. He can make them without any democratic input. They have the force of law until congress passes a law overruling them or the supreme court strikes them down. The most famous, or infamous, instance is when President Roosevelt signed an executive order to round up and put into prison camps all Japanese Americans living in the continental United States regardless of citizenship status or if they were natural born citizens or not.
Basically, a democratic leadership style is almost impossible in the pure sense. If a leader had to stop and get a vote every time something had to be done, it would be as paralyzed as the Czar.
what style of leadership does Queen Elizabeth II posses?
I’m doing an assessment for the subject Community and Family Studies. I need to know what leadership styles Queen Elizabeth II has and why she has gained them.
the styles are:
- task orientated/people orientated
- autocratic
- collaborative/shared
- laissez faire
- transformational
- cultural
if you could could you please inform me what styles she is and why?
As a Constitutional Monarch, I would IMAGINE that Queen Elizabeth II had a collaborative/shared leadership style (based on your options). All laws are enacted in her name but her power is excercised at the will of the sovereign, by Parliament. This has been pretty much the case since William and Mary signed the Bill of Rights in 1689. The Glorious Revolution of 1688 which overthrew James II pretty much put an end to Autocratic government (even though realistically it had officialy ended following the Magna Carta but power was still very much in the Sovereigns grasp up until 1688).
Charismatic & Democratic Leadership Style on i news Hyderabad by Syed Rafi
Syed Rafi Corporate Trainer from Hyderabad discussing various leadership Styles on I News Channel.
More details about Syed Rafi can be found at http//www.atcs.in
Duration : 0:3:33
Leadership Styles – Practice Effective Leadership
There is much that is written about leadership; like books on leadership styles, techniques and also biographies of leaders that have inspired people to action. While this is true, there is the everyday leadership and a slightly different outlook to leadership as well. Here are a few of them.
1. There Are Different Kinds of Leaders
Among leaders are formal and informal leaders. Formal leaders are elected to their positions like congressmen, senators and office bearers of clubs. Informal leaders on the other hand are those we look up to because of their experience and wisdom. This could be your parents, grandparents or elders in your community. Informal leaders can also be those that are respected because of their expertise and contributions in certain fields such as Albert Einstein in Theoretical Physics and Leonardo de Vinci in Arts. Whether formal or informal, these leaders practice certain styles. This could be
a. Lewin’s 3 basic leadership styles
- autocratic or authoritative: the leader takes decisions without consulting with others
- democratic or participative: the leader involves the people in the decision-making
- laissez-faire or delegative: the leader’s involvement in decision-making is minimized
b. Likert’s 4 leadership styles
- exploitative authoritative: the leader has a low concern for people and uses such methods as threats and other fear-based methods to achieve conformance
- benevolent authoritative: the leader adds concern for people to an authoritative position
- consultative: the leader makes genuine efforts to listen carefully to ideas, but major decisions are still largely centrally made
- participative: the leader makes maximum use of participative methods, engaging people lower down the organization in decision-making
c. Goleman’s 6 emotional leadership styles
- visionary: the leader inspires, believes in own vision, is empathetic, and explains how and why people’s efforts contribute to the ‘dream’
- coaching: the leader listens, helps people identify their own strengths and weaknesses, counsels, encourages, and delegates
- affiliative: the leader promotes harmony, is nice, empathetic, boosts moral, and solves conflicts
- democratic: the leader is a superb listener, team worker, collaborator, and influencer
- pacesetting: the leader has a strong drive to achieve, has high standards, initiative, but low on empathy and collaboration, impatient, micromanages and is numbers-driven
- commanding: is commanding, threatening, has tight control, monitors studiously, creates dissonance, contaminates everyone’s mood, and drives away talent
2. Leadership Skills Can Be Developed
For some people, leadership seems to be most natural, that it makes you wonder if it is a quality that they are born with. Even if this may be true, without exposure to the right environment, it is possible that they may not develop to their full potential.
You can learn how to become a leader. Attend leadership trainings or leadership seminars. Read books on leadership. You can observe the leadership skills in your daily interactions not only in the working environment but even at home and social environment. This becomes obvious when something goes wrong and you see how this person responds and sets things right.
Observing both formal and informal leadership modes, you can pick up leadership insights and further your knowledge on leadership skills.
Remember, though, that leadership styles are not learnt in a day. It needs daily use to learn from daily experiences and to put your learnt knowledge and skills to the test.
3. Practice Makes Perfect
Theoretical knowledge alone is not sufficient to develop leadership styles. The best way to develop it is to apply it at every opportunity you get. As you get better at it, people will recognize that you take charge when you are around.
Leadership is not only handling situations. It is also how you carry yourself. How you interact with people be it your work colleagues, family, friends or the guy at the bookstore. It is also reflected in how well you manage your personal and organizational responsibilities.
If you keep applying your knowledge, leadership should become a habit to you.
4. Successful Leadership Requires Trust Between The Leader And Team
There is no leader without the team members. The responsibility of achieving objectives is a shared responsibility as the leader alone cannot achieve them.
A person may be made leader as a formal position but this does not necessarily mean that he or she can bring the team together to complete the tasks at hand. Each member will have their own skills that makes them informal leaders in those areas.
The formal leader needs to be able to work together with the team and generate trust to build a cohesive group. Just words are not enough. Appropriate actions will be required to foster trust and to build confidence.
5. Situational Leadership
The type of leadership varies depending on the situation at hand. You cannot just apply the last technique you learnt without due consideration to the situation.
In emergency situations, like a fire, you cannot be consulting everyone on the decision. It is different during normal times, especially when you need everybody’s buy-in. In this case, you will want to take a consultative approach.
The style you choose will also depend on the skill level of your team. For a highly skilled and motivated team, you may use a combination of high delegative and moderate participative styles. But if the team has low competence, you may need to use a combination of high coaching, high supporting and high directing leadership styles.
leadership styles need to be continually learnt not only through leadership training and books but also from observing other good leaders. Most importantly, practice because the best learning will be that which you learn from your own experience.
Regina Maniam
http://www.articlesbase.com/self-help-articles/leadership-styles-practice-effective-leadership-107425.html
Who were some great leaders who utilized a democratic leadership style?
Quick reminder: involving the group to make decisions.
I’m looking for examples of people throughout history who led others using this leadership style. I know Eisenhower was one when he was leading the Allies during WWII. I need help coming up with people and what they did…
Your thoughtful input is greatly appreciated!
Well, Lord Montbatten was Eisenhower’s boss…
Wars usually brought out the great leaders… Patton, McArthur, Nemitz, Halsey, Yamamoto, Stalin, Churchill, Tito, Mao
Some of the best leaders were not democratic leaders… you can’t run a democracy when you are leading men in a war… so your question is flawed.